SSCS designs camouflage to match what hunting country actually looks like.
A reclaimed clear-cut. A pine thicket. A late-season tangle of bare stems and faded growth. A dark creek bottom. Dry western country. A rocky ridge broken up by stone, lichen and sparse vegetation.
Those places do not look alike, so there is no reason camouflage made for them should all look alike either.
Designed by the Woods Themselves
That phrase has been part of SSCS for a reason. It does not mean taking a photograph of a tree and printing it on a shirt. It means paying attention to what the woods are actually made of.
Real hunting cover is not a wall of tree trunks. It is brush, vines, saplings, pine, briars, weeds, dead growth, new growth, leaves, limbs, shadow, broken ground and everything tangled together between them. The mix changes with the terrain. It changes with the season. Sometimes it changes within a few hundred yards.
After a lifetime spent hunting, those differences become hard to ignore.
Sometimes a particular habitat gives me the idea for a camouflage pattern. Other times I create a pattern first, look at it, and immediately know the kind of country where it belongs. Either way, the same question matters in the end: does it look like it belongs there?
The Thicket Family
Five SSCS patterns share one basic philosophy: Meltdown, Fallout, Thicket, Vanish and Pinewood.
They are siblings, but they are not copies of one another. Thick cover does not have one look.
Meltdown grew from the look of reclaimed clear-cuts and the tangled regeneration that takes over after the timber is gone. Fallout takes its character from mixed thickets where trees, brush, foliage and shadow all compete with each other. Vanish reflects the way that same kind of cover changes later in the season, when vegetation fades, leaves thin out and stems and tangled growth become more visible. Thicket lives right in the heart of that heavy-cover philosophy. Pinewood takes it into pine country, where a pine thicket has its own texture and character.
Why keep coming back to thick cover?
Because that's where the deer are.
That is not a laboratory slogan. It is a hunter's observation. Deer use thick, broken cover, and a lot of the places hunters actually meet them are messy, tangled places. SSCS camouflage should look at home there too.
Dry Country, High Country and Rock
Saber-Tooth, Mountain Lion and RidgeRock form another related family.
Saber-Tooth and Mountain Lion share the idea of dry, broken western country and high-country terrain. Saber-Tooth uses broader, heavier tiger-style striping, while Mountain Lion works with narrower striping. They are different approaches to the same general world: dry foliage, scrub, exposed earth, broken vegetation and hard shadow.
RidgeRock leans farther toward the terrain itself. Rock, lichen, weathered surfaces and sparse vegetation become part of the picture, making it at home in rugged rocky country and the kind of northern terrain where stone can dominate the landscape.
Some Patterns Find Their Own Home
Not every SSCS pattern begins with a specific habitat in mind.
Void is a good example. It was not created from a checklist for one particular piece of ground. But once the pattern came together, its natural home was easy to see: deep shade, creek bottoms, swampy woods, dense cover and places where direct light has trouble reaching the ground.
Sometimes the terrain creates the pattern. Sometimes the pattern reveals the terrain where it belongs.
Wetlands and Snow
Mallard Grass carries the SSCS approach into wetland cover, where grasses, reeds and broken vertical vegetation create a completely different visual environment from hardwoods or thickets.
White Wolf does the same for snow country. Snow-covered terrain is rarely a blank sheet of white. There is bark, brush, rock, shadow, dirty snow and exposed vegetation breaking it apart. Snow camouflage should account for the country underneath and around the snow, not simply turn everything white.
One Philosophy, Different Country
SSCS designs camouflage to match what hunting country actually looks like.
The outdoors is too varied for a one-pattern-fits-everywhere approach. Sometimes that means starting with a very specific habitat. Sometimes it means recognizing where a finished pattern belongs. And sometimes it is simpler than either of those: I put a pattern against the woods and know whether it looks right.
There is no need to dress that up with laboratory language. The proof is in the terrain.
Look at the habitat. Look at the camouflage. Decide for yourself whether it belongs.
Designed by the woods themselves.
Finally, Camouflage Done Right.
SSCS. We've got you covered!
0 comments